| 1. Profit distribution (TOP 2) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 450 | ||
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,081,435 76.786 % 7,506 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.123 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,073,929 | (= 99.877 %) | |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 2. discharge of the Board members (TOP 3) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 553 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,081,332 76.784 % 2,330 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.038 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,079,002 | (= 99.962 %) | |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 3. discharge of the Supervisory Board menbers (TOP 4) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 553 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,081,332 76.784 % 2,331 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.038 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,079,001 | (= 99.962 %) | |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 4. election of the auditor for the business year 2010/2011 and for reviewing the semi-annual financial report for the 2010/2011 business year (TOP 5) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 2,321 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,079,564 76.762 % 10 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.00016 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the directive proposal | 6,079,554 | (= 99.99984 %) | ||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 5. election of the Supervisory Board (TOP 6) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 3,321 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,078,564 76.750 % 1,310 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.022 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the supervisory board proposal | 6,077,254 | (= 99.978 %) | ||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 6. amendment of the statutes (TOP 7) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 1,301 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,080,584 76.775 % 2,655 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.044 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,077,929 | (= 99.956 %) | |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| 7. repurchase of shares (TOP 8) | ||||
| | votes | | percentage | |
| | ||||
| voting presence less abstentions | ./. | 6,081,885 102 | | |
| | ||||
| No. of (valid) votes cast Percentage of thusly represented statutory share capital less „NAYS” | ./. | 6,081,783 76.790 % 14,839 | (= 100.000 %) (= 0.244 %) | |
| | ||||
| No. of votes cast for the administrative proposal | 6,066,944 | | (= 99.756 %) | |